Look at the crane;
it walks about pretty fast
in water. But while walking, it cannot catch fish. When it
wants to catch fish,
the very same crane becomes quiet and stands motionless. So
also, if you
proceed with greed, anger, and similar negative qualities, you
can never secure
the fish of truth (sathya), righteousness (dharma), and peace (shanti). With any spiritual practice you observe,
please add the
practice of uninterrupted remembrance of the Lord's precious
name (namasmarana). Only then can you master the natural
attributes of greed,
anger, etc. All the scriptures (sastras) teach but this one key lesson! Since the Lord
is the
universal goal and this journey of life has Him as the
destination for each and
every one of you, keep Him constantly in your view and subdue
the mind, which
makes you wander from the path.
Baba (thought for the day)
Like the crane has to
stand still first to catch the fish, the mind has to stand still
to be able get
to truth (sathya), right action (Dharma), peace (shanti) and as
we remember
without those three we cannot experience ‘pure love’ and without
‘pure love’ we
have no experience of divinity.
Look at the crane;
it walks about pretty fast
in water. But while walking, it cannot catch fish. When it
wants to catch fish,
the very same crane becomes quiet and stands motionless. So
also, if you
proceed with greed, anger, and similar negative qualities, you
can never secure
the fish of truth (sathya), righteousness (dharma), and peace (shanti).
We know if we don’t meditate, we
will never know
the difference between ‘pure being’, non-conceptual and
non-limited and mind
and world, conceptual and limited beings.
If we observe, watch,
he asks us to add the practice of uninterrupted remembrance of
the Lord’s
precious name, the mantra.
I began to watch
early because of the troubles I describe and get aware of when
thinking it over
and I find in details confirmed in the book of Bradshaw I quoted
because it is
good and it is a different approach to it. We watch, we watch
since we are
twenty or even before, what about you, when did you begin with
watching? First
I watched the thoughts and I decided to change nothing until it
was out of the
higher self, I just watched. I watched already when writing a
diary and at that
time I was sixteen and writing didn’t make sense in that moment,
but watching did
make sense. I watched how I made the decision to go on until the
higher self
would be present. Everything what I watched was just passing by,
it had no real
value. If it were feelings, situations, it passed by, after a
week it was gone
and I have hardly any feeling about it or memory about it,
because my focus was
on ‘watching’. Whatever happened in Neuchâtel, I tried to
communicate it, but
it was difficult or nearly impossible, I began to notice that
nobody understood
it what I said if I said I watch and therefore, I had to give it
a purpose and
I said, I search for truth. In the mean time it went from
watching to take it
as it comes to accepting truth. Search for truth was not really
a search, it
was there as it was truth, and I just had to get able to see it.
I mediated
often at weekends with OM and I just went on watching. I didn’t
read books, I
didn’t listen to Veda or masters, I had written the book of
Yogananda
Paramahansa, but that was at that time in California only and
for me too far
away.
In the mean time we
use his words and it does make more sense. If I tell I search
for truth, it
seems like doing something, if I tell I watch, it is like just
waiting and
watch, if I tell that I take it as it comes, I watch and I am
ready to accept
truth, it is not searching truth. If we call it search it is
just because we
don’t know it yet.
With any spiritual
practice you observe,
please add the practice of uninterrupted remembrance of the
Lord's precious
name (namasmarana).
Only
then can you master the natural attributes of greed, anger,
etc. It was all about watching, but he asks us to add he practice of the remembrance of the divine,
that is Soham for
example and he is constantly present in the breath. So it is not
just watching
and taking it as it comes, but it is adding the divine name and
he is telling
us by doing that we can master the natural attitudes of greed,
anger etc.
And if we master
them, we stand still in the mind and we can catch the fish
sathya and that is
accept truth and if we are able to accept the path of truth, we
have to accept
right action and that right action has now to do with a certain
message related
to that divine name and the truth and that is also the path to
peace,
therefore, we have to understand it right.
Do we understand it?
All the scriptures (sastras) teach but this one key lesson! Since the Lord
is the
universal goal and this journey of life has Him as the
destination for each and
every one of you, keep Him constantly in your view and subdue
the mind, which
makes you wander from the path.
He again refers to
the scriptures, here the sastras, they are also part of Veda,
everything is
part of Veda and he calls it a key lesson.
The Lord is the
universal goal; we have to reach that universal ‘love’ of the
divine omnipresent
and the one only without a second. Our journey of life has him
as destination
for each and every one of us. That is why we should keep him
constantly in our
view and that happens in standing still in the mind, watch,
meditate, go beyond
the mind, it is the mind that makes us go into wrong conclusions
and it makes
us wander from the path.
What is the key lesson?
Watch and add the divine name in remembering it always.
I was continuing with
the book yesterday now with the second chapter and it is good.
So I resumed it kind
of, but also in thinking it over.
The second chapter is
the wonderful child and how it got hurt.
Wonderful is again
the key, w - for wonder, o – optimisms, naiveté, dependence,
emotions, and
resilience, free play, uniqueness, love and it is the word -
wonderful. As I
read the book in German it is also a control if I understand it
right.
That is the second
chapter in the book, ‘Homecoming’ from John Bradshaw. First I
resume it and I
try to share insights about the inner child work and our
experience in the Darshan.
In the Darshan all in
the beginning was the insight, it is about ‘wonder’ and I didn’t
understand
that word really, I didn’t know if it was positive or negative,
often it is in
English, but that was in German. If we see it in the light of
the child we know
it is positive, it explores and tries to know itself. I don’t
know how many
times I have to think it over to remember it.
Wonder is also
described as ‘energy’ and if we take his words we have,
‘without enthusiasm,
courage, devotion, energy, readiness and sincerity nothing can be achieved' (Baba).
So I would say that
wonder is part of energy. It is not negative at all, even if we
translate it as
greed for wonder in German, what is also a trace of negativity
in it.
I think the
translation it not okay, it means miracle, wonder, astonishment
and
mystification, I don’t think that the word ‘Neugierde’ is the
right word in the
translation, but it is also translated in the book like that and
it was in the
insight as ‘Neugierde’ and not as wonder and amazement and that
feels like
critics, because it can also be negative. If we translate it
word by word it
means greed for something new. I didn’t know if it was positive
or not, it felt
more like critics and that is was not just about
self-improvement, but about
greed for what is new and we just have that word ‘greed’ in the
last thoughts
for the day.
Neu is new and Gier
is greed. So it had both in it, but in the book it is only
positive, it is the
first impression of the new born and it wants to explore and
experience the
world. If the parents don’t allow it, it will hinder the child.
And I think that is
the mirror of the translation, my parents hindered it and
therefore, the child
was not free to explore it. If the parents are against it the
child’s
uniqueness it will close down and not be open to risks anymore.
For such a
child life is a problem that has to be solved and it is not
anymore open and it
goes for safety first.
So if I said that I
began to watch it is because of that reason, life was a problem
that has to be
solved and I began to watch with the aim to solve that problem
and as I had
been let down, I didn’t know how to open to risk anymore. With
TM we went for
safety first and with the Lord it looked safe as well, but in fact
it was the
biggest risk.
It is not only I but
the Swiss tendency to go for safety, we have that many
insurances because it
goes for safety first, and it is also only possible because it
is a small
country.
So it could have to
do with that cultural background that it was translated as
‘Neugierde’ in
German and not English and I wondered if it was good or bad, was
it good that I
was with the Lord that it felt like 'Neugierde’ in Darshan or was it bad?
Actually with the Lord we went for no risk and that was the biggest illusion. Because
there was love, we
thought we would be okay. I didn’t know how to get there, as I
didn’t know why
I felt like that. The conflict between risk and no risk, with the Lord we could go
for it, because he was behind it.
Wonderful, the second
letter is o like optimism, thinking positively, and trust in the
world. It is
about the divine inner child, trusting in Lord as he is love and
the parents. The
child had to trust fully in the people and his family.
We don’t have a
computer system that tells us what to do. When a child is abused
and misused,
it gets with the time into pessimism and that it has to
manipulate the environment
to gets what it wants and that is the level of the neighbor.
Instead of using its
strength to be in touch with the environment, it is convinced
that it has to
manipulate the person that it happens what should happen. We
find that in our
neighborhood, it was all manipulation only the reason behind; it
was ignored by
my mother and with her by all others. We can think that the
neighbor was
pessimistic and he didn’t see any other way to get what he
wanted than in
manipulation and he had a village consciousness, what has to do
with my father
and the echo coming back from the village consciousness.
I don’t know him that
well, but that it resulted in manipulation only that is a fact
and that my
mother had a pride problem and was not able to accept that, is
also a fact now.
Optimisms and trust
are the pillars and the soul for intimacy.
If we go for
intimacy, we have to know that we can be vulnerable. We can
never make enough
experience to trust someone totally, we have to take a risk and
the neighbor
was too much risk in that sense. My mother wanted to see only
the good and she
was running around to make it ‘good’ and she didn’t want to see
what was not
good and that was dangerous, because the village consciousness
came back the
way it was and we have to accept truth, we cannot just see good
and ignore
truth.
I trusted in the Lord and
that opened the door for it. Only if we are optimistic we can
see good and be
good and feel good. It is what you said if the glass if half
full or half
empty, if it is about optimism it is half full and not half
empty.
Next word is
naive. It makes the
inner child
attractive, charming and innocent, as it is the inner child and the Lord is the
parents. For the inner child it is also the lust principle or
pleasure and they
have a feeling for what is good and bad.
The small child has
to be watched. It is experimenting with everything also with
what is poisonous
and the child is surprised when the caretaker is not happy about
it, the
caretaker or parent has to be patient and if that is missing, it
is
overwhelming for the child.
In most of the cases
of child abuse the caretaker is convinced that it the child has
bad intentions.
The adult expects from the child a maturity which is not real on
the child
level. His tendency to explore is misunderstood as bad intention
and sin what
is used in the most cruel ways to punish a child.
There are lots of
regressive practices of child rearing.
Montessori was great
and it opened my eyes about the adults and the gap between the
adults and the
child that is why I liked to go for it and it was not only about
a job, with my
parent’s house I could only benefit from the Montessori
training.
The next point is
dependence. The caretaker has to notice the need of the child
and be able to
meet with it. If the parents are themselves living in an
unfulfilled need they
are not able to meet the needy child. They use the child as an
extension of
their own person. That is my mother or it was in my parents. She
got enervated
if we showed a need expecting us to be old enough or grown up
and she had to
save the father. It felt like she made the child part of the
extension of their
own life, we had to listen her talking non-stop about him only
and when we were
tired of it and said something we were ungrateful etc. Once I
asked her about respect,
I didn’t know how to see respect in all of that. She got upset
and said that I
should be old enough to know about it and that I never grow up
and there was
nothing I could do with that answer, she didn’t take my question
serious or
tried to know why I asked it. She didn’t know it herself; she
just made it look
like she was in control and like she knew, because she had her
savior role.
There was no need met
by my parents, every need was too much and they avoided it or
put us in
question and after my father said, ‘you are still too young’.
Without relationship
and love we cannot live. If a child is hurt, it isolates itself
or it retires
or it tries to get it from elsewhere and that is certainly what
was present in
me afterwards, I tried all tree, I isolated myself and I retired
and as I
didn’t wanted to get back to them I tried to get it elsewhere
and that was with divinity.
As soon as I came
back home, it was for five minutes great and then I wanted to
leave again and
never come back, that was always the same vicious circle and I
didn’t know why,
I began to think that I wanted to travel and I saw it not
anymore as the reaction
to get away from something, but my own with to travel, when it
was in reality
the result of the feeling in the parent’s house, I just wanted
to leave, get
out of it, go away. They were only concerned about themselves;
we had like no
room and not part in it.
Feelings and laughing
is an expression of humor. I noticed an expression of humor in
my daughter when
she sat as small girl in front of her father's suitcase and she took
his underwear
out of it and the smile in her face was just great. I made photo
of it and a
long time I didn’t see what it should be a problem to be a
family, only he has
no humor. It took a long time to get aware that the humor was
missing.
And my mother was
like that, she always said, ‘don’t laugh so loud, we all laughed
and I was not
louder than the other and she said it as habit to the oldest
always, maybe
because I was the older, maybe she picked on me or she felt that
I didn’t know
how to defend myself, she said it to me no matter how loud the
others were
laughing and I hated her for it. I just didn’t feel that hatred
and I didn’t
know that it was hatred, but today I know.
We had to get aware that it was different
and behind I was right and everything else was wrong and to get
aware of that
was also a shock. And I began to question it and I really had
feeling of hatred,
I just didn’t know that it was the mother as she always used the
father to punish;
I thought it was the father. I didn’t wanted to go back anymore,
I didn’t want
to listen to her and see her anymore and some time I really
managed to stay
away and I got married without them being present etc. We went
to see them in
Spain, but we also were away for a lot of time and they didn’t
care about it
and I hated her for it.
It was incredible the
joy in Darshan and it seemed nearly not possible that it
felt that
screwed up with my family. I tried to keep distance as much as I
could, she had
no idea how I felt. There was always something wrong, no matter
what we did.
It is called in that
book the primal pain and primal work and Osho’s therapy worked
on that level,
it was a lot about primal work, it has to do with mourning and
grieving and
only if we mourn it enough we are able to heal it.
Resilience we know
from TM, I know it more with the expression, flexibility and I
know from that my ex was not flexible. If we are younger we are more
flexible and it
is associated with courage.
Without enthusiasm, courage, devotion, energy, readiness and sincerity nothing can be achieved. (Baba)
We have courage together with flexibility. With TM we had to keep the balance between infinite flexibility and infinite stability.
And we know now that
if there is no light, there is no devotion and energy we had
also already it
was at the beginning in the chapter of wonder it was mostly
about energy and
the difference if it is positive or negative energy. And now it is about
flexibility and courage.
Free play that must
be a catastrophe with my parents. The free play allows the child
to transcend
the routine and the level of habits and that we can see in Darshan, it
was all based on being free, we didn’t have to attend a Darshan
and therefore,
it was not felt that it was the same always and a repetition.
He tells about Nietzsche,
to appreciate the play of the child we have to find the
sincerity again the
child had in playing when it was a child. And here was have the
sincerity.
Next comes
uniqueness, the wholeness in the child makes it to something
unique and
wonderful and precious. Precious stones and gold have value, but
that child has
much more value. If the caretaker is not giving back to a child
the feedback of
that preciousness and as it really is, the child loses the
feeling that it is
something special.
Children are by
nature spiritual and whole, it is yet naïve and without critics
and only later will
be developed a mature and reflecting core of spirituality. To
spirituality
belongs a part that is deep hidden in us and it is our true
self. If we are
spiritual we stay in contact with our uniqueness, it is our
being and our
special features. To spirituality belongs the feeling that we
belong to
something that is bigger than ourselves. He tells that he
believes that it is
the I-ness that makes us similar to God. If people have
developed a feeling for
it they are in harmony with their own self and can accept
themselves and it is
the nature of the child knowing how, it tells ‘I am who I am’.
And God tell to
Moses, ‘I am the – I am that’ and in the that I am is the deeper
sense of
spirituality.
He makes the
spiritual injury responsible for it that we grow into dependent,
shameful adult
children. The ruin of a man or a woman tells the story how a
unique divine
child has lost the feeling for ‘I am who I am’.
The next part is
about love. A child has to be loved before it can love. The
healthy development
of child is depending on an adult loving it and accepting it as
it is. If we
love a child not for its own sake, it cannot develop that love.
The troubles in
the child’s experience are the result of deprivation of love.
The is growing up
in an environment deprived of love and in the adult child is
always that hunger
for love, because it never got the love it should have. We have
find a way to
take care of the inner child and be the caretaker it never had
before.
The spiritual wound is
the result of a wounded divine child and the loss of a natural
feeling for
itself. The uniqueness of the child has to be acknowledged by
the parents. The
time we spend with the child. Parents create shame if they have
not enough time
for them.
If a mother is an
alcoholic she has no time for the children and it is with all
addictions the
case, also with work addiction and the parents are constantly
under stress, it
can also be with a religious activities, eating disorders or
control freaks,
perfectionisms or sicknesses, whatever the reason that the
parents are focused
only on their own problems, they have no time to watch their own
children and
the uniqueness of the child gets lost or overshadowed, because
they have no
time for it. That is called neurotic families, no time to speak,
no time to
listen, they are that occupied with their life and their own
neuroses, they
don’t have time to love the child and to give him the feeling
that it is
special.
The frustration and
longing of such a child to be loved is the biggest trauma it can
experience.
Some parents are in need themselves and are therefore not able
to give the
child what it needs. The child usually gets wounded when itself
is in need and
would need the attention it should have and that makes me
remember how I felt
when I went the first time to America.
Whatever I did,
whatever I said, seemed to be just a bother or passing by
unheard and finally
there was that job in the motel I went to learn English and it
was just a job
and I didn’t like that job and my parents ignored it totally
after I came back
I got that ‘no’ from my mother’s side and it was like cut off,
it had no
relationship whatsoever with what I told her and in fact today I
know she was
only concerned about what they had done and if I said something
I put that in
question and it was ‘no’.
Whatever I said, my
mother said no and I had always the feeling she didn’t hear it.
That image of
them working together standing there and no interest how I
arrived and that it
was not organized, nobody took any responsibility for it and it
was my problem.
I just didn’t understand it, they were like not present. In the
mean time I
know that it was the mother’s attitude, the father left it to
her and was at
her side, if it was right or not, he didn’t question it.
The education of my
parents was no more felt and after I came back it was not
possible to find the
feeling of being home anymore, I felt homesick in my parent’s
house, I missed
the little girl I had been in that place and that is why I
wanted to leave on
the spot again. I didn’t like the person they made out of me, it
had no
nothing, no feeling, no character, no dignity, no beauty, no
wisdom, no reason
to talk, nothing to tell and if we tried, we just had to shed
up.
It was a strange
place to come back and to know that is actually my parent’s
house or it should
be, but I get homesick being here and I have to leave I cannot
take it.
I didn’t come back
afterwards anymore or only if I had to, I went for a visit after
I had been
with the Lord trying to get what was wrong by insights.
Everything what had
been unique and it feels unique if we see it in the light of the divine and we can
remember the childhood as it had been before, but it got lost,
they felt like
walking around with blinders and when they opened up it was just
to criticize
and to tell what do you have, there is nothing or you are ‘too
young’ or you
could never do that, or you should not.
Going for a visit in
my parent’s house was the experience of getting homesick, the
child was gone I
had been once, the right to be there was gone, they didn’t feel
like family
anymore.
But for them it was
like nothing had happened, it seemed all was as before, but for
them only, I
couldn’t find myself in it anymore. And with that feeling it was
not possible
to face the world and to know how to live my life. So I did my
job and I was
searching for truth and I began to go in direction of the higher
self as
self-realization had been present during the time I wrote my
diary and that
attitude of my mother reflects that she refused to look at the
neighborhood and
what had happened and she avoided to accept truth. She lived in
her illusion
and went on in that illusion.
In the presence of the Lord it came up
what had happened in the parent’s house and when and how and why
I had been let
down by them and that it was ignored and avoided by the mother
due to pride and
attachment.
I found that text in
the internet about the triangle.
The
Victim-Rescuer-Persecutor Triangle is a psychological model
for explaining
specific co-dependent, destructive inter-action patterns,
which negatively
impact our lives. Each position on this triangle has unique,
readily
identifiable characteristics. Whenever a person becomes
entangled in any one of
these positions, they literally keep spinning from one
position to another,
destroying the opportunity for healthy relationships. The good
news is that
once a person becomes aware of these positions and chooses to
break this cycle,
they can transcend the V-R-P Triangle. Resolving these
dysfunctional behaviours
is one of the main keys for healing ourselves and creating
healthy
relationships. After describing each position and showing how
each position
relates to the others, I will describe how to break free of
this triangle's
destructive patterns.
And it feels nearly
perfect and it matches the attitude of my mother and the picture
I have of my
mother.
The Rescuer - Rescuers believe they have all
the answers and know
the right solutions for others. Although their own lives are
often in shambles,
they spend hours, days, weeks or even years attempting to
change, control and
to get love from others. Rescuers frequently wear a false
cloak of power and
superiority, always appearing to be confident and in
control. Rescuers love to
take care of and direct the lives of other people. Through
controlling and
changing others, Rescuers attempt to gain a sense of
identity as well as to
gain love, attention and respect. They pretend to know more
than other people
and frequently have an answer for everything, even though
they have little, if
any, actual knowledge or experience regarding the subject. A
Rescuer, on the
surface, looks like the "good guy/woman" and is often
depicted in
movies as the "hero" wearing a white hat and riding a white
horse.
Rescuers are personified and glorified as saviours or white
knights saving
others from distress and evil. Without someone, something or
a cause to Rescue,
these people are lost and jobless! They don't realise they
need to rescue
themselves!
Rescuers,
people
who initially appear to be so caring and self-sacrificing, are
often
dysfunctional. This is especially true if they are playing the
role of Rescuer
in an attempt to feel good about themselves, to gain
attention, love, feel more
powerful or to control others. Oddly enough Rescuers are
seldom happy in their
own personal life and their relationships are usually in
chaos. They never seem
to be able to use all their "supposed knowledge" to heal their
own
lives.
Victims and Rescuers are drawn together to play out their game. They need each other. After their initial joyful honeymoon, a time during which each is able to "Star" in their favorite role, they soon tire of this very demanding and exhausting game. When either person, or both, gets bored with the game and wants to change or stop, or even to heal themselves, they frequently end up Persecuting each other rather than seeking healthy ways of interacting. Any change can trigger a conflict because the "Game" and the "Rules" have changed. Both the Victim and the Rescuer have a vested interest in keeping this "Dysfunctional Game" going. If they end it and heal, who would they have to play with? Taking personal responsibility and identifying ones own innermost wants, needs and desires is not the strong point of any of the positions on the triangle.
It was not possible to get her of that pattern and it said once in the insight, ‘for your mother it is too late, she is too old’, it was just before I began that inner child workshop.
She had all the symptoms, it
felt like she
did it only to feel good herself or to gain attention, love and
feel more
powerful or to control others.
That didn’t change with us being with divinty. Nothing changed it and when coming back we were always again in the same situation, it was just about getting aware of it.
Maybe something could have changed if I would have gone to Osho at that time when he was in my dream, but somehow it was a strange time, it was just in that time when his secretary left and the troubles on the farm in Oregon began to be in all newspapers.
It was not really a good time to go for it.
But it is definitely that work with the inner child what makes us aware of the problem and when I went for it and applied for that inner child workshop it was also in the insight as ‘right’, and I thought the workshop was right and I don’t know what I expected, the answer we get now I hoped to get and that we didn’t get, we just began to know it and we had to learn and make the experience of it to be able to get there, the answers we wanted are coming only now and now we even know why.
No comments:
Post a Comment